Відео

Not derived from or related to the NASA work on lifting bodies. It's from the cold war USSR space interceptor the "Spiral" and the Soviet MiG-105 test plane of it. See videos on UA-cam of the MiG undergoing testing After the BOR-4 test subscale model flew from orbit, NASA Langley found it to be a markedly superior lifting body and spaceplane.

still a really good concept but feel the transfer vechile would be starship.

Song?

Putin will buy this!

RIP Skylon; There's no tea in space...

This, is Elon Musk

Is there life on mars? ❎ Is there tea on mars? ✅💂

These guys need to invest in better attitude control systems... all their spacecraft are struck in a roll.

Feel bad that she never got a chance to fly

Cuando vi este engendro allá por aquellos años ya me pareció totalmente ridículo, parecía diseñado por un niño. No sé cómo engañaron a los inversores. La nave era totalmente incontrolable y tenía un aspecto de fragilidad muy preocupante . Dinero tirado a la basura. No era un proyecto serio.

Ahora en el 2023 por fin sera lanzado al espacio pero con el FALCON HEAVY de SPACE X.

Do you have more historic footage of the Ariane 1-4 family?

Outro de novo o passarinho pegou outro foguete de novo

O X-4 super bem como os de

O negócio voando

Parece o passarinho passar no motor foguete

O que aconteceu no do ônibus especiais??

The most expensive music video ever.

Dinosaur

As a spaceman who has possibly seen distant Lightcraft descendants, I highly approve of the Deodata track. Also sprach Zarathustra. Bravo from behind the blue door.

Va capsule anyone?

Average Russian station:

This is what happens when engineers get drunk off their asses and come into work at 3am

My Maker's I need you Nilesh Gaikawad here from pimpri INDIA

144p in 2010, imagine ! LUL. So a potato

ua-cam.com/video/-HON9aLAodw/v-deo.html

spacebucketisntrealspacebucketcanthurtyou

4 years NASA, tic toc tic toc

"Omni Future Almanac" by Weil and Bova on spaceflight.

Bussard of 1961 Los Alamos had an engineering proposal for an ASPEN nuclear spaceplane.

For a 2010-vintage early-UA-cam-era presentation, this was actually quite good. There are probably elements in this show that would be more suited to exploration or even colonization of Earth's Moon rather than Mars. From what the space agencies have learned since 2010, it seems unlikely that an interplanetary expedition that lacks a large, spin-gravity habitat to house the expedition team for the duration would be practical. There's also no apparent protection for the astronauts from solar radiation or galactic cosmic rays, either for during the interplanetary journeys or during their stay on the Martian surface. It seems that emphasis has been placed on using Martian surface (or Martian moon) resources to shelter the base-camps from these dangerous rays (and meteors). If the Troy Mission Vehicle used a Von Braun-style spinning wheel, or if they used a simpler spin setup like the computer-generated images on Fragomatik's UA-cam channel [ "Alpha LEO Station": ua-cam.com/video/4aA_g2SPZTM/v-deo.html - OR - "Concept 6 - Mars Transfer Vehicle": ua-cam.com/video/cUDL2dUpXW0/v-deo.html ], it would make sense as an interplanetary mission vehicle. But without spin gravity and that protection, the safety and health of the astronauts would be placed at great risk.

Epstein Drive

A great idea who's time has come, I thank SNC for carrying on where NASA left off. The next step is to source a renewable booster for Dream Chaser, 100% reusability is the goal.

Buzz Aldrin said carrying crew and cargo together made the Shuttles more expensive and less reusable.

Spaceplanes are better than a vintage 1961 Yuri Gagarin brute force mentality of vertical flight. "Shen Long" or "divine dragon" in Mandarin launched from a Xian H6, "Stratolaunch", Richard Branson's "Scaled Composites" of Burt Rutan, and "Xcor Lynx" are already in use since spaceplanes have often been used to develop hypersonic missiles. Synergistic air breathing rocket engines or liquid air cycle engines able to use diborane are a great improvement. However, there is a better design of how to use aerospace cryogenic fuels of less complexity for easier repairs. Of March 2019 at an engineering conference held inside MIT's Electrical Engineering Dept. on Vassar Street of Cambridge, MA. I gave a presentation on how early 1940s Hamgyong Province and Manchuria a Noguchi and Songsu of NItchitsu were working on a cosmic ray muon catalyzed rocket plane engine to have a Dewar of cryogenic liquified deuterium connected to a beryllium alloy reaction chamber nozzle coiled in and around electromagnet coils cooled by cryogenic fuel to focus cosmic ray muons while alpha particles are deflected away before beryllium converts alpha particles into neutron flux to enrich fuel. Sakharov's work on Muon catalyzed fusion began just after Soviet Russian Troops had pillaged Northeast Asia during the Fall of 1945 and Alvarez's work on muon catalzyed fsuion began just after United States Peacekeepers had returned from touring ruins of Hamgyong Province.. Soviet Russia had tested a lifting body orbiter having a retractable cone on top since reentry temperature exceed Cuire Point. I have Prior Art on Jerome Drexler Patents since during the 1990s a Dr. Mitchell Swartz affiliated with MIT published my peer reviewed articles on such a topic. Executive of Norront Fusion Energy complimented me on such a presentation. Other issue is author Robert K. Wilcox has a book to portray Jun Shitagau Noguchi as a "mad Dr. Strangelove" with a great bibliography ignoring how Noguchi gave Fritz Hansgirg a chance to first Patent how to extract deuterium isotopic fuels to consider how Barabara Molony is considered to have a neutral position on such inventors . Due to Eurocentric and Afrocentric anti-Asian racism of the early 1940s such inventors were often forgotten just as Mary Kenny of the 1920s who invented ground based ducted louver covered fans to regulate aerial traffic for dense high aspect ratio urbanized areas was a victim of gender discrimination sexism of her time. WWII was a politically correct popular war so it is impossible to obtain an unbiased balanced view of what other technologies could have bene lost and "Special Effects" by Christopher Finch describes how the United States military from late 1930s to early 1940s was the number one purchaser of image optical printers. Also at such an engineering conference I suggested how Naranjo and Putterman Patents of UCLA for cryogenic pyroelectric crystal electrode fusion could be improved for a Carbon Fusion lamp via a molecular sieve to only allow CO2 carbon dioxide to enter and be fused to form oxygen. A Jae Ho Choi of Dankook University Patent improvement via pyroelectric crystal electrodes has parallels to Naranjo and Putterman OF UCLA patents based on a Farnsworth fusor so to permanently remove CO2 carbon dioxide one should consider a carbon fusion lamp. Robert L. Morrison has Patented lighter than air solids one could seal in metal foil for a lifting body spaceplane to have Lockwood's Patented valveless pulsejet engines powered by Podrog's Patented x-rays on hafnium reactor. Mutsuro Bundo, Hector A. D'Auvergne, etc. have Patented spaceplanes. "Omni Future Almanac" by Ben Bova has nice illustrations of spaceplanes. Motohiko Inai has a Patent for a muon catalzyed fusion rocket engine.

It just so happens that I have known a lot about this project for a long time... It's incredibly disappointing that this project was closed, BUT I know the true reason for the failure of this plan! It's ridiculously simple - such a device can NEVER function normally, without such a thing as a "gravitsappa"! This is a serious flaw!!!!

144p? No wonder they didn't get the contract....

What aircraft was used in this test? I saw in a book of a Scaled Composites Proteus being used for a t/space test flight.

This is an interesting project I wish got off the ground. It is difficult to find a lot of information about this spacecraft, so thank you for the video!

Can you imagine a project like this revamped now that we are getting space vehicles like SpaceX Starship?

Aaand NASA doesn't have the money for things like this.

too bad, it didn't happen.

Thank you Mark Sirangelo for your years of dedication to this project from SpaceDev to Sierra Nevada Corp. Sorry you had to leave the program too soon. And thank you Jim Benson for your vision and inspiration getting the Dream Chaser on the road to the future. You accomplished much in the short time you had on this earth. Your legacy carries on. I'll always be appreciative of your kind invitation to the SpaceShipOne Pre-lauch Party, pre-X-Prize attempt. Man, you changed the future!

The modificatuon i would recommend. Is imagine a 3x large modern vertical fighter jet engine, then mounted adjacent to the wing limbs as 2, you then have a craft that can semi hoover or semi runway shortly for lift. With the rocket booster as the rear center rod of the engine.

Mr. Bigelow you are such a Amazing Man. What a "Genius" you are. The CSS Skywalker Space Stations are Phenomenal. They are Incredible. What a Great,Great,Great Job 👍👍👍 you have done. Your Friend Debby.

wow this is very similar to something done in ksp. Good video bro

WE didn't do this because salvaging and outfitting the ET's on-orbit is tougher than it sounds and frankly we don't have a 'working' space suit at hand and the current and projected pressure suits are unsuitable for the tasks. Couple that with the general lack of will in any nation to seriously exploit space, (and no, no nation is 'serious' about using space, we just 'dabble' at it) it means funds and support are low. What most space-fans/advocates fail to understand is that "space" actually means very little to the majority of people on Earth so therefore it means little to the politicians and governments of Earth. At current costs, (yes that includes SpaceX here folks even assuming Starship works as advertised) getting resources from space or colonizing the Moon or Mars is not viable. You not only have to move thousands of people and millions of tons of supplies you have to HAVE hundreds of thousands of people actively INTERESTED in going to and exploiting space and those numbers just do not exist. Space is a very hard place to live and even harder to work in and we don't have the access or economy to do a lot more than we already are. That can change some if the price of access gets low enough but until that happens we are lacking the infrastructure and ability to economically exploit space. And we have to build that infrastructure and economy before we will begin to see more interest in space. There is no short-cut. This kind of stuff is what you see WHEN that interest is more wide spread but the STS didn't live up to the economic promises and the US government, (politicians folks, not NASA though they too didn't have a lot of interest) never supported, (still doesn't and no it's not a "party" thing it's across the board) nor were interested in an expanded space program. There is a huge amount of work and effort that still needs to be done and no one person, no one group and certainly no one 'vehicle' are going to enable it all. The STS was never used to it's fullest that's true but it was used about as much as could be expected given the overall support and interest that was available.

RIP

I wanna see the development starting soon or soon as possible. I’m afraid Obama 2.0 it’s going to start cutting funds for NASA to give to his illegal aliens.

bruh